E3 2015 Digital Presentation Review

Let's call a dog a dog. This year's E3 presentation from Nintendo was disappointing. I stop short of hyperbole here as they did show games -- most of which will release within six months, almost all within the next year, and several of which I will buy. However, I also won't go along with the historical revisionism and comparisons. One person I heard compared this reveal to the reaction Wind Waker being Cel-Shaded. I mean come on! This is nothing like that. Nintendo dropped the ball.

It is inevitable that they have an off year:

Reggie presenting the  E3 2015 Nintendo Digital Event

To accuse Nintendo of not listening would be dishonest. Nintendo knew they did well last year, they also knew people didn't care for non-games and would be hostile to mobile games so they thankfully left those for other events.

Nintendo's problem this year as the simple logic of how games are made. They rode the last couple of E3s with games far into the horizon that the chickens, so to speak, have come home to roost. They have to showcase the same games they announced one or two E3s ago because they are almost ready, but they can't show games further out because the Wii U's future is without a doubt tied up with their NX platform, which they already confirmed would be absent this year.

Nintendo's problem here was not entirely about content. It was context. As someone put it best, Nintendo went from weakness to weakness. In the Sony presser, a 'filler' Final Fantasy game was followed up by Final Fantasy VII remake. Nintendo simply didn't have anything to show.

Content Management:

Given the hand it was dealt (no Zelda), Nintendo then managed the content it had poorly.

Yoshi's Wooly World did not need another long-winded expositional 'developer' insight this year. They had one last year and the company heavily promoted this game at the Nintendo World Championships and in their half hour slots with Twitch.tv and Youtube E3 channel just a day before their Digital Event.

Star Fox Zero: No on-line Multiplayer (again) ; Mediocre Visuals

Star Fox Zero could have used interviews outside of Miyamoto to put at ease the the initial lukewarm reaction many people had that save for a few locales, the game looked more like a Star Fox 64 remaster than a true sequel running on 'new' gen hardware. 

Then again, given the game will not have on-line multi-player (again!) and had mediocre visuals in part due to the need for the game to render a separate scene on the game pad, it almost feels like Nintendo is sending out Star Fox to fail yet again.

The other game that could have used an extended preview was Metroid Prime Federation Force. The game admittedly looks rough and early. But some of those rough edges could be smoothed over with the developers explaining the concept of the game. It would also help break the monotony of Japanese only developers talking about their games. Metroid Prime Federation Force is made right here in my hometown of Vancouver and it's too bad the game got shuffled away like an uncle after Thanksgiving.

Further more, Nintendo sent their 'mature' games out to pasture once again by not showing off the games in their presentation, choosing instead to show them off immediately after their digital event. The one fall game I am really interested in, Fatal Frame Maiden of Black Water was one of those titles they didn't show. Nor did they build hype on Itakagi's multi-player Devil's Third as a kind of 'change of pace' for people who maybe got into the multi-player 3^rd person shooter scene with Splatoon and now wants something different but along the same lines (hint: people can play more than one game at a time).

The most egregious of these content issue however is Animal Crossing Amiibo Festival. I don't begrudge Nintendo learning from their City Folk experience by wisely choosing to skip out on Animal Crossing on consoles so soon after New Leaf on 3DS to let their team recharge and dodge accusations they merely 'up-ported' their handheld game and did nothing more. However, I do take issue with the blatant attempt to get Nintendo fans, and more specifically Animal Crossing fans, to put money down on what appears to be a C-tier board game simply because it works with some really nice Animal Crossing amiibos. I can see the $79 boxed set now with an amiibo or two packed in the box. The game and the amiibo functionality is a blatant attempt at gouging us.

Animal Crossing Amiibo Festival (the most hated game this E3?)

I would have much preferred they cut this from the digital event and showed this game off at a Treehouse event and not bother playing with people's emotions at a digital presentation. People were expecting Animal Crossing for Wii U, and I nodded when I saw Isabelle in HD thinking "well there's Animal Crossing Wii U, right on schedule", only to be first confused and then let down by the game that was finally revealed to us. This has got to be the worst way to show off a game as it annoyed a lot of fans, and these are the people Nintendo needed to buy this thing. Heck, for all I know it might be a good game for what it is, but I certainly have no interest in playing it now.

Here's the kicker. Amiibo is doing very well for Nintendo right now and they badly needed Disney Infinity style game to tie together all their Amiibos  in a fun open-world game that would leverage the existing owners of Amiibos. 

I would be remiss to not mention Super Mario Maker, which fans know well enough, as well as Hyrule Warriors Legends, the 3DS port of Hyrule Warriors that was accidentally leaked early by Koei-Tecmo last week.  The game looks interesting and may have helped had it not been revealed early, but Hyrule Warriors Legends, along with the heavily multi-player centric Zelda: Triforce Heroes are filler games designed to push software that really didn't help or hurt their presentation. Super Mario Maker had just the right amount of exposure but it didn't really help here as the expectations were already baked in after this past sunday's insanely amazing preview at the Nintendo World Championships.

Expectations:

Despite a steady stream of warnings, including Reggie's direct disclaimer at the beginning of the Digital Event  advising fans they would only be showing games coming soon, Nintendo simply didn't manage the presentation and expectations properly and maybe they really couldn't.

Nintendo knew what they had to show wasn't going to blow people away and gave plenty of warnings. Iwata hinted heavily on Sunday there will be no major reveals as he was not going to be in attendance at E3 because there would be no new hardware, re-iterating a statement weeks before E3 that the NX platform and their mobile games would not be showing at E3.   But the fans failed to heed the warnings.  Perhaps encouraged by Nintendo Directs weeks before E3, as well as informational reveals on the Sunday before E3 of new Smash content (Ryu and Roy) and the surprise release of Earthbound Beginnings on Virtual Console in a rapturous Nintendo World Championships event on Sunday, many fans whipped themselves up into a fervour, believing that if Nintendo willingly let these mini-reveals go ahead, they must have amazing stuff for the Digital Event.

When Sony dropped their triple threat of Shenmue III, Final Fantasy VII remake and The Last Guardian plus several other very interesting original IPs in their presentation on Monday, fans doubled down on 'major announcements' because this is E3 and Nintendo wouldn't let themselves get beaten like that.

Well, Nintendo did, and part of the blame needs to rest squarely on the fanbase.

Apology Accepted:

Soon after the Digital Event, Nintendo president Satoru Iwata went on twitter to make his mea culpa, admitting, circuitously that the event had not met people's expectations and promising to do better.

Translation of Tweet by @Cheesemeister3k

To the team at Nintendo and Mr. Iwata, apology accepted. Your fans had themselves to blame too, though that doesn't excuse the poor structure and content selection in your digital event.

I do want to close with a bit of concern with the apology. The cycle of fan disappointment and Iwata apology appears to be a constant lately. I think this reflects positively on Iwata's personal style of taking ownership and being transparent, but I fear that it is in one-ear out-another form of apology where we're told they will do better but other pressures eventually take precedence and we will be back in this position in a few year's time . And let's not kid ourselves here, Nintendo has had disappointing E3 shows in recent memory, like E3 2012 with the over-long Nintendo Land 'surprise' or even arguably 2011 with the botched reveal of the Wii U. Each time, we are told Nintendo seemingly learned from their mistake but inevitably they make new ones, like today's presentation. Perhaps they should hire a panel of their own fans to focus test their presentations in the future. Most fans would gladly do it for free. I work cheap (free). My payment will be in the satisfaction of helping shape an important event for Nintendo.

NX and beyond

E3 2016 is almost certainly going to be a better show for Nintendo, just because of the cards they have dealt themselves. They bit the bullet this year to give themselves plenty of bombs to drop in 2016 with the NX, not to mention a hardware reveal is always exciting. Part of me want this half-decade long struggle of my favourite video game company to end in 2016. Perhaps it will be like their E3 2006 Wii reveal, or the one in 2004 when they kicked ass and took names. Let's hope this is the last 'bad' E3 for Nintendo in a long while. We've had way too many of them lately.

Nintendo World Championship 2015 – Shoestrings and Remixes

I wasn't planning on writing anything about the Nintendo World Championship 2015 qualifiers this past weekend as none of the events were near where I lived, but spotting Patrick Scott Patterson's epic story at his event led me down the rabbit hole and I sound found several other stories detailing what seemed like a lukewarm event across a couple of other locations.  

Several stories here and here, complained of low attendance, hours spent waiting outside Best Buy, and generally 'unfun' event management, with one participant questioning the use of NES remix as the game for the qualifiers. Nintendo apparently was expecting and allotted time for over 700 to participate in some of their locations, at least two reports indicate less than 200 showed up to their events.   This led to a rule-change mid-day that generated some controversy related to Patrick Scott Patterson's San Francisco event where only 150 showed up for the qualifiers and Nintendo allowed participants to retry their attempts, while other locations (presumably busier) may not have allowed it.  

Though to be fair, at least one report I found, from the Tacoma Washington event appeared to have gone off smoothly.  The Torrance California event (video below) also appears to have gone well.

Stepping back, this all seemed like something Nintendo of America's marketing department pulled together on a shoestring in early May with no time to properly organize. Nintendo have the Nokia theatre at E3 to fill (it's already rented and sunk) and Smash tournament last year did well for them so this is the next best thing. But announcing the whole thing about a month before E3 and jamming in qualifiers in just 8 locations weeks before the supposed 'championships' and on the same weekend on of their bigger releases (Splatoon) hit was probably not the best idea.

If Nintendo still have Nokia theatre for 2016 and want to continue with the World Championships format, I would hope they roll it out over many more months with qualifiers stretching across both the US, Canada (bonus points if they manage to set up events for Japan and Europe) with events happening across malls and Best Buys in the post Christmas late winter/early spring months, where space is cheaper to rent, and foot traffic wanted. This would lead to semi-final event held at PAX or some other major fan convention to build hype, with the event ending at E3 in June.

Nintendo is not the swaggering company that could do no wrong it was in the 90s, granted. But it's still a multi-billion dollar a year operation and a major player in video games. A very rich one at that. It is a bit disrespectful to its fans to organize such a bare bones event in so few locations on a what appears to be shoe-string budget.  The apparently low turn out and the resulting rule changes have already generated some controversy  that may have tainted the final outcome. Speaking as a fan, this past weekend's qualifiers is disappointing, and I feel for those who lined up outside Best Buys to participate. 

All that said, Patrick Scott Patterson's first hand account of his time at the qualifiers is a great read. Highly recommended.